Why is the HPA Talon SS about $45 more than CO2 version…?
At PA, I am seeing the Talon SS w/no clamp, or sights is $474.95. The CO2 version w/adapter & 12oz filled w/CO2 is $429.50.
The more I look, the more attracted I am to the CO2 Talon SS. And, I now have $675.00 to spend.
After all of this, looking into used scuba, etc,,, & the price of a Hill Pump; I think personally, I would be happier going CO2. I wanted more power at first. But, I really don’t need more power.
And, with the extra cash, I have now, I even thought about going Condor in .22 on CO2. That way, I would have the greater power. Then; the loudness factor came into it.
All Replies
Viewing 12 replies - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Viewing 12 replies - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Co2 may not be your answer. Works for me, but I’ve a specific set of circumstances. I really have no need of more than 11 – 12foot pounds, need the quiet, and live in a warm climate (was 80F today).
The Talon SS does cool faster. Only have 12″ of barrel, and it’s the barrel that provides the heat-sink for c02 drive. The cold gas is vented inside the reciever (which is what quiets the gun), but in doing so the barrel gets much colder much faster. Add to this, here is no good way to get a temperature reading of the barrel….so even with a nice warm tank and rifle (the part you can touch), will find that a longer time between shots is needed to get back to stable.
(Talon isn’t alone in this…those who’ve added a shroud to conventional CO2 guns find the same thing going on…the exiting gas gets a chance to cool the inside of the barrel, the outside of the barrel, and the inside of the shroud before exiting into the atmosphere.)
As for price, bulk CO2 (welding supply) is running about $.12 an ounce. While air is “free”, the pump/tank/fitting, and upkeep isn’t. Am sure there is a break-even point out there, but suspect it is a long way down the road.
IF there is an accuracy difference, it’s happening past 50yards…at least up to that range, haven’t found any significant difference (and with a sub 12 foot pound rifle, I’ve no doubt that as range extends, the faster HPA verisions will group better).
——-
On the bright side, noticed that at the Shot Show, AirFroce OK’e the use of nitrogen. May not make a difference to many of you, but there are a lot more places to find high pressure nitrogen than high pressure air (this is esp. true once you get away from the coast line where dive shops are more common.)